Thursday, 15 August 2019

David Frum thinks he found a constitutional violation in Trump’s tweet about Israel barring Reps Tlaib & Omar (and people have thoughts)

We already know that some in the anti-Trump Resistance consider the president’s tweet about Israel and Reps Rashida Tlaib and Ilhan Omar to be an impeachable offense. Here’s the tweet in question:
It would show great weakness if Israel allowed Rep. Omar and Rep.Tlaib to visit. They hate Israel & all Jewish people, & there is nothing that can be said or done to change their minds. Minnesota and Michigan will have a hard time putting them back in office. They are a disgrace!

49.5K people are talking about this
David Frum thinks he spotted a constitutional violation:
President Trump today violated right in front of all eyes, on Twitter, the Speech and Debate clause of Article I

2,557 people are talking about this
Really? Many didn’t share Frum’s constitutional interpretation on this one:
For those interested in what words actually mean, the Speech/Debate Clause does not give members of Congress an all-access global vacation pass. What it does is prevent lawmakers from being arrested while on the floor, heading to it for votes, or for speeches made while on it.

201 people are talking about this
Courts have repeatedly ruled that the Speech/Debate Clause covers only "inherently legislative" activities like voting, not political ones (op-eds, rallies). An extracurricular vacation organized and funded by a foreign NGO is not a legislative activity, @davidfrum. Be smarter.

141 people are talking about this

How is spreading constitutional illiteracy reinforcing and bolstering the constitutional system?

15 people are talking about this
Jennifer Rubin was among those who didn’t take issue with Frum’s constitutional hot take:
In the name of “conservatism” maybe Rubin decided to give Frum a pass on that.
So in conclusion:

No comments:

Post a comment