Maxwell is happy that Fort Bryant is clean and safe – and Democrats don’t like that.
Maxwell is happier at Fort Bryan, but Dems are sad because she did not implicate Trump.
Democratic members continue to try to chart a path of their own in the House Oversight Committee, with the express purpose of trying to will into existence something against Donald J. Trump.
Now, they have subpoenaed emails sent from Ghislaine Maxwell since her arrival at minimum-security FPC Fort Bryan.
Their current objective is to show Maxwell getting privileges and try to force-turn this into a damaging narrative against Trump.
In the emails that the Dem Oversight members subpoenaed, we learn that the disgraced socialite and convicted sex-trafficker celebrated to friends and family that she feels better with the ‘cleanliness and safety’ of Camp Bryant.
Dems want to find fault with Maxwell’s presence at Bryan.
“’The institution is run in an orderly fashion which makes for a safer more comfortable environment for all people concerned, inmates and guards alike,” wrote Maxwell, who is serving a 20-year prison sentence for recruiting minors to be sexually abused by her longtime confidant, the wealthy financier Jeffrey Epstein.”
The dem members shared with NBC News the emails sent by Maxwell on her first few months at FPC Bryan.
“’My situation is improved by being at Bryan. […] The kitchen looks clean too — no possums falling from the celling to fry unfortunately on ovens, and become mingled with the food being served’, she wrote in another, complaining about her previous prison.”
Maxwell jogging at the tough FCI Tallahassee.
Maxwell called camp warden Tanisha Hall a “true professional.
‘I feel like I have dropped through Alice in Wonderlands looking glass. I am much, much happier here and more importantly safe’.
David Oscar Markus, a lawyer for Maxwell, has an angry response, saying it’s not ‘journalistic’ to publish a prisoner’s private emails, ‘including ones with her lawyers’.
Maxwell also complained about the media ‘selling rubbish stories’, ‘making money from lies’.
House Majority Whip Tom Emmer was on “Fox News Sunday” and talked about last week’s election with some Democrat victories. He blasted the Democrats for their poor economic record and defended President Trump’s America First policies.
“Will the message change or refocus, going into 2026?” Bream asked.
“Under Joe Biden, it was the American Rescue Plan, wrongly named, where Democrats pumped 2 trillion dollars into the economy, and what did they do? Economists call it the “original sin.” It drove double-digit inflation we hadn’t seen in 40 years,” Emmer said.
“Donald Trump inherited that broken economy and he has been fixing it. Energy prices are down, grocery prices are down,” Emmer continued.
“We gave the Democrats a clean continuing resolution to keep the government funded,” Emmer said.
“And what was their response that your previous guest doesn’t even mention? They want to spend 1.5 trillion dollars, 1.5 trillion. It is essentially the same failed economic policy that put Americans in the ditch under Joe Biden,” Emmer continued.
“Donald J Trump is not going to let them do that again. He is going to continue to improve on this economy,” Emmer said.
“Democrats should put the American people first,” Emmer continued.
“Voters though on Tuesday night, they are not feeling the economic improvement yet,” Bream said.
Bream cited the Wall Street Journal in regard to last week’s election.
“This narrative about Tuesday night is completely false. Democrats won in the places we expected them to win,” Emmer said.
Rep Emmer called out Democrats’ extremism with the example of Jay Jones being elected as the Attorney General of Virginia.
“You thought there was some decency on the other side of the aisle, but apparently not. They want an assassination fantasizer as the Attorney General in Virginia,” Emmer said of Jay Jones.
“Donald Trump is the one who is fixing affordability,” Emmer Said.
“That’s why we are gonna hold our majorities in the House and the Senate,” Emmer said.
Watch:
House @GOPMajorityWhip tells Fox News Sunday the narrative of Tuesday elections is “completely off,” arguing Democrats won where they were supposed to win. pic.twitter.com/09rkBDJfJa
Images taken from screenshots of Iranian sources, including the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) Quds Force, courtesy of MEMRI, a media which opposes the Iranian regime.
Hardliners and conservative commentators in Iran celebrated Zohran Mamdani’s election as New York’s first Muslim mayor as a symbolic victory for Islam over the West and a sign of America’s decline.
State-affiliated outlets such as the conservative daily Hamshahri and Nour News framed the win as “America Against America,” interpreting it as proof of deep divisions within the U.S. establishment and the “collapse of the old order” marking the beginning of the end of “Trumpism.”
Conservative and state-run media emphasized that Mamdani’s win reflected both a moral and political defeat for America and Israel, with Asr-e Iran describing the election as a “crossing of the mental barriers” created after 9/11 and the erosion of the “Jewish lobby’s” power over U.S. politics.
The IRGC Qods Force Telegram channel called it “the defeat of Trump and Zionism” and “a joyful event” marking America’s changing identity.
In Iran’s parliament, lawmaker Abolghasem Jarareh declared that Mamdani’s victory “shows the strength of the slogan ‘Death to Israel,'” prompting fellow MPs to chant it on the floor.
Tehran mayor’s spokesman Abdolmotahhar Mohammadi praised the result as evidence that “the people of New York reject the influence of a genocidal regime in U.S. governance,” calling it a boost to pro-Palestinian and anti-racist movements worldwide.
Tehran University ideologue Foad Izadi described Mamdani’s rise as “the arrival of the message of 13 Aban in New York,” invoking the anniversary of the 1979 U.S. embassy takeover, a cornerstone of Iran’s revolutionary hostility toward Washington.
Former culture minister Mohammad Hosseini credited Mamdani’s campaign to inspiration from Imam Hossein and the spirit of Ashura.
For Iran’s hardliners, Mamdani’s Shiite background and anti-Israel rhetoric validated their long-standing belief that America is collapsing under its own hypocrisy and moral decay.
They celebrated the rise of a Shia Muslim to power in what they view as the center of Western capitalism, framing it as proof that Islam is advancing within the heart of the enemy’s political system.
Pro-regime commentators portrayed his win as both a political and spiritual triumph over the forces of “arrogance,” arguing that Mamdani’s faith, class-based rhetoric, and pro-Palestinian stance echo the Islamic Revolution’s principles of justice, resistance, and opposition to Zionism.
His victory was cast not merely as a local event but as a divine sign that the West’s liberal order is faltering and that the narrative of Islamic resistance is spreading inside the enemy’s own institutions.
According to The Tehran Times, Iranian commentators framed Mamdani’s election as proof that the American capitalist system is collapsing under its own contradictions.
The paper described his socialist platform, free childcare, rent freezes, public transit reform, and higher taxes on the wealthy, as a direct challenge to U.S. capitalism and evidence of growing anger among ordinary Americans toward an economic order that enriches elites while impoverishing workers.
It characterized the United States as a nation where “billionaires live next to people who can barely pay rent,” portraying Mamdani’s rise as evidence that Americans are rejecting inequality and searching for a fairer alternative to the capitalist model.
Founded in 1979 after the Islamic Revolution, The Tehran Times framed his election as part of a global political shift led by the oppressed and working classes against the “bullies and thugs in the White House.”
His criticism of Israel and defense of Palestinian rights were highlighted as marks of moral courage and proof that the Western narrative on Gaza is weakening.
Asr-e Iran presented the result as a sign of shifting attitudes toward Israel, particularly among younger Americans, and as evidence of the “Zionist lobby’s decline” in New York, home to the world’s second-largest Jewish population.
Mamdani’s pro-Palestinian stance was celebrated as a triumph for the “Axis of Resistance” and proof that revolutionary ideals are spreading into the heart of the United States.
By aligning his socialist and anti-Israel message with Iran’s own revolutionary rhetoric, The Tehran Times cast Mamdani’s victory not merely as a domestic American development but as a symbolic win for the oppressed, confirming that history is tilting toward Islam’s eventual victory over Western hegemony.
According to a report by the Jerusalem Center for Security and Foreign Affairs titled “Tehran Celebrates Mamdani: ‘A Political Earthquake, A Crack in the Pro-Israeli Hegemony,’” Iranian discourse now frames the Islamic Republic as a “demanding side” rather than a reactive one toward Washington.
Supreme Leader Khamenei’s remarks on the “Day of Struggle Against Global Arrogance” reaffirmed that the battle between America and Islam is ideological.
Mamdani’s victory is also expected to embolden the political left in America and across the West.
The Cleveland Jewish News reported that the win is being hailed as a watershed moment for the emerging “Red-Green” alliance between the radical left and Islamist movements, a coalition gaining traction in both Europe and the United States.
Fiamma Nirenstein, Italian-Israeli journalist, author and former politician, described Mamdani as the embodiment of this new ideological partnership: a politician who built his campaign on pro-Palestinian rhetoric, anti-Israel activism, and the rejection of Western democratic norms that once anchored New York’s Jewish and pluralistic identity.
Mamdani’s victory symbolizes how anti-Zionism has become a socially acceptable form of antisemitism, even in America’s most Jewish city.
His promises to cut ties with Israeli institutions, boycott city–Israel partnerships, and divest from Israeli funds are seen as steps toward normalizing hostility to the Jewish state under the banner of social justice.
Nirenstein warns that while Mamdani’s policies may or may not benefit ordinary New Yorkers, the greater cost will be moral and cultural, signaling a West drifting toward moral relativism, hostility to Israel, and the loss of its Judeo-Christian democratic foundations.
